![]() ![]() The first criticism is that in recent times, the much-discussed low reproductive rate of SJW's, which seems to happen for all the wrong reasons, presents a dilemma for Evola's dialogue. While many of those observations are true, I can think of two criticisms that I would make, and this ultimately leads me to a short conclusion about the nature of control. Evola also argues that within the human population, those who have fewer children are generally higher ranked than those who have more children, thus lower class people have more children than higher class people. This is why there are insects who have hundreds or even thousands of children but human beings, at the top of the hierarchy, tend to have the fewest children. According to Evola, the lowest organisms reproduce the most, the highest organisms reproduce the least. ![]() ![]() For those who don't know what Evola's argument is (and if this is complicated later on in the book, I will admit that I'm not aware of it because I have not finished it yet), Evola's metaphysics establish the relevance of love and reproductive in a metaphysical hierarchy. ![]() I've been slowly making my way through Julius Evola's "Eros and the Metaphysics of Love." It's one of those books where each page gives me a lot to think about, it's practically impossible for me to read such a book quickly. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |